Evaluasi Usability e-Learning Moodle dan Google Classroom menggunakan SUS Quisionnare
Abstract views: 1455
,
PDF downloads: 939
Abstract
Abstrak
Objektif. Evaluasi Usability E-Learning diperlukan guna melihat tingkat kepuasan pengguna terhadap Platform Moodle dan Google Classroom, sekaligus menentukan platform manakah yang lebih memenuhi aspek Usability.
Material dan Metode. SUS Qestionnaire merupakan salah satu metode evaluasi yang digunakan untuk melihat usabilitas dari sebuah produk perangkat lunak., kuisioner ini disebarkan kepada responden mahasiswa aktif dari berbagai angkatan.
Hasil. Berdasarkan hasil SUS Questionnaire Google calssroom memiliki SUS score 82,8, sedangkan Moodle (ELMA) memiliki SUS Score 40,8
Kesimpulan.Sehingga dapat dikatakan E-learning dengan platform Google calssroom dianggap lebih memenuhi unsur Usablity dari pada E-learning dengan platform Moodle (ELMA), tetapi tidak menutup kemungkinan untuk diperbaiki, dengan mengakomodasi seluruh masukan dari pengguna untuk menghasilkan E-learning yang dicintai pengguna.
Abstrak
Objective. Usability evaluation is needed to measure of user satisfaction from Moodle and Google Classroom, and determine whos better form both in Usability aspect.
Material and Methods. SUS Questionnaire is one of the evaluation methods used to measure the level of usability from a software product. This questionnaire was distributed to respondents from various forces.
Results. The SUS Questionnaire result was Google classroom has a SUS score of 82.8, and Moodle (ELMA) has a SUS Score of 40.8
Conclusion. The Google Classroom platform was considered to be better in Usability aspect than Moodle platform (ELMA), but it can be improved, by accommodating all suggestion from users.
Downloads
References
Sujito, F., Arifudin, R., & Arini, F. Y. (2019). An Analysis of User Interface and User Experience Using System Usability Scale and GOMS Method, 1(October), 65–73.
Rusdiana, A., Sulhan, M., Zaenal, I., & Ahmad, A. U. (2020). Penerapan Model POE2WE Berbasis Blended Learning Google Classroom Pada Pembelajaran Masa WFH Pandemic Covid-19, 1–10.
Setiawan, D., & Noordin Asnawi, H. A. M. (2017). LECTURERS INFORMATICS ENGINEERING STUDY PROGRAM, (Icons), 1168–1173.
Setiawan, D. (2019). Analisis Dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi LENTERA Untuk Membentuk “ Smart Society ” Di Lingkungan Kampus Menggunakan Metode OOAD ( Studi Kasus : Universitas PGRI Madiun ), 155–159.
Setiawan, D. (2018). ANALISIS KEBUTUHAN E-LEARNING PROGRAM STUDI SISTEM INFORMASI UNIVERSITAS PGRI MADIUN. SENATIK, 30–36.
Kaya, A., Ozturk, R., & Gumussoy, C. A. (n.d.). Usability Measurement of Mobile Applications with System Usability Scale ( SUS ).
Finstad, K. (2010). Interacting with Computers The Usability Metric for User Experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004
Taylor, P., Borsci, S., Federici, S., Bacci, S., Gnaldi, M., Bartolucci, F., … Bartolucci, F. (2015). International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction Assessing User Satisfaction in the Era of User Experience : Comparison of the SUS , UMUX , and UMUX- LITE as a Function of Product Experience Assessing User Satisfaction in the Era of User Experience : Comparison of the SUS , UMUX , and UMUX-LITE as a Function of Product Experience, (August). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064648
Revythi, A., & Tselios, N. (2019). Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning.
Baumgartner, J., Frei, N., Kleinke, M., & Sauer, J. (2019). Pictorial System Usability Scale ( P-SUS ): Developing an Instrument for Measuring Perceived Usability, 1–11.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
